Thursday, April 6, 2017

Vague threats are a bad idea, Mr. President.


President Trump
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington DC, 20500
5 April 2017 

Dear President Trump: 

According to CNN, today you met with Jordan’s King Abdullah and spoke on the phone with German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.  While CNN didn’t report on what you discussed, I am assuming that you spoke about some of the trouble spots in the world.  Also today, North Korea test-fired another missile.  CNN quoted you as saying “Well, if China is not going to solve North Korea, we will.” 

I think that may have been a dangerous thing to say.  I an imagine that there may be times in international relations when it is necessary to issue a threat, and that North Korea's nuclear program may be present such an occasion, But when a threat is vague and unclear, it can come across as far more belligerent than you perhaps intend it to.  When you make a vague threat you allow a lot of room for interpretation.  Since North Korea is ruled by a paranoid, egotistical madman his interpretation will likely be that you intend an attack on his country or his person in whatever way his imagination can think of.  If he were the only person in that country, this might make sense.  In fact, however, North Korea is populated with innocent people.  Regardless of what measures you intend, there is a huge risk of those innocent people being endangered.   

I wanted to write to remind you that not only do our actions, no matter how well intentioned, put people at risk, but your words, as the leader of our country, put people at risk as well.   I encourage you to seek wise counsel and think careful before you act or speak on matters of world conflict.

Regards, 

Bill Boerman-Cornell

No comments:

Post a Comment